Friday, May 11, 2007

Social Gospel

I saw this article on the "Social Gospel-100 years later" and wandered who is ultimately responsible for social justice and reform. Being conservative I am in the camp that supports individual efforts while others see that as a governmental responsibility. Government waste surrounding programs designed to deal with social issues is the very reason many on the conservative side support the "Faith-Based Initiative" that has yet to find its wings. Providing means without bureaucracy makes sense.

The article deals with other issues such as the dissociation of Christianity in its point of practice. I have yet to understand "liberal Christianity" in any sense. It seems like an entirely different religion to me.

2 comments:

Dana said...

BRAVO. I concur!

Reegz said...

"YEah,heh,heh" Liberal Christianity gets the Beavis and Butthead laugh from me. Thats like a "straight-gay." What? Alright, now I'm in a punchy mood. Thanks Matt....